The Ultimate Guide to Construction Programmes

By

Daniel Gray

and Julia Tell

Reviewed by 

Justin Vogel

, Alex Six

, Zoe Mullan

, and Nicholas Dunbar

Last Updated Jan 30, 2026

By

Daniel Gray

and Julia Tell

Reviewed By

Justin Vogel

, Alex Six

, Zoe Mullan

, and Nicholas Dunbar

A successful construction project requires careful project management, and one tool stands out as the cornerstone: the construction programme. Think of it as a roadmap detailing who needs to do what, where, when and in what order. It's all about coordination, planning and careful decisions.

A well-structured construction programme enables professionals to manage resources more efficiently, saving time and money. It helps anticipate potential delays before they become major issues, keeping work on track. Finally, a solid construction programme clarifies for everyone involved – from Main Contractors and supply chain partners to clients – what must happen and when.

Here, we explore the basics of construction planning, including the principles that lead to a robust programme, various methodologies and approaches, and common challenges – along with strategies to address them.

What is a Construction Programme?

A construction programme outlines task sequences, timelines, durations and resources needed to complete a project. Construction professionals use this strategic tool to coordinate activities, milestones and deliverables. Once construction begins, it becomes a living document navigating obstacles like adverse weather, ground conditions, supply issues and labour shortages.

Regardless of format – Gantt chart, network diagram or 3D model – the programme maps timing and sequencing from start to finish. Professionals use specific vocabulary when managing construction programmes:

Project Managers create programmes by breaking work into tasks or activities, estimating durations and arranging all project tasks based on dependencies and timing requirements

Effective programme development also requires proper work breakdown, activity sequencing and resource allocation.

Who Creates & Manages Construction Programmes?

Construction planning involves multiple professionals working collaboratively. Various team members play key roles in developing and managing the programme:

• Planner

  Commonly a dedicated role within UK Main Contractors and consultancies, the Planner creates and maintains the programme, ensures logic remains sound, and reports on progress against the contract baseline.

• Project Manager

  Oversees the planning process, aligns the timeline with project goals and provides leadership throughout the project's life cycle.

• Site Manager

  Provides practical insights from the field, helping to make the programme workable and aligned with daily operational realities.

• Architect/Designer

  Aligns construction sequences with the architectural design and vision, making necessary adjustments to accommodate design elements.

• Engineers

  Supply technical expertise to anticipate and resolve structural and engineering issues within the programme.

• Subcontractors (Supply Chain)

  Deliver specific trade timelines and requirements, allowing for accurate integration of their tasks into the overall programme.

• Commercial Manager

  Works closely with the Planner to link programme progress to valuations and payments.

• Client/Employer

  Reviews and approves the programme, confirming it meets their expectations and aligns with project objectives.

Project size determines who leads programme creation. The Project Manager may handle small residential developments, while large commercial projects require a dedicated senior Planner.

Stay updated on what’s happening in construction. Subscribe to Blueprint, Procore’s free construction newsletter, to get content from industry experts delivered straight to your inbox.

How to Create a Construction Programme

Construction programmes rely on fundamental principles including Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), critical path analysis and resource allocation. Each principle is explored in further detail below.

Understanding Planning Levels 1 to 5

UK construction planning often follows a hierarchy of detail to ensure alignment from the client's strategic goals down to daily site activities:

• Level 1: Strategic/Master Programme

  High-level client dates and key milestones.

• Level 2: Tender Programme

  Summary programme produced by the Main Contractor during the tendering phase.

• Level 3: Contract/Baseline Programme

  The fully detailed, agreed programme that forms the contractual baseline.

• Level 4: Look-ahead

  Short-term extraction (usually 2-6 weeks) for managing upcoming works.

• Level 5: Daily/Weekly Task Lists

  Granular detail for site teams and subcontractors.

Step 1: Define Scope & List Tasks

Construction projects are extremely complex, making it essential to break them down into smaller parts. Understanding the full scope of work and dividing it into smaller components prevents details from falling through the cracks.

Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

Professionals use Work Breakdown Structure to identify the components making up the entire project, which helps estimate, tender packages of works to subcontractors and schedule tasks.

In essence, WBS creates a project hierarchy from large (the entire project) to small (a single task). In practice, it looks like this:

To use the WBS effectively, construction professionals rely on several rules:

• 100% Rule

  The next level down in the WBS completely describes the level above. This ensures the WBS captures every part of the project's work.

• Mutually Exclusive Elements

  Each element in the WBS stands distinct from all other elements. The team should allow no overlap in scope between different elements. This prevents work duplication.

• Measureable Work Packages

  Construction professionals call a group of related tasks at the lowest level of the WBS a work package. The team should define these packages so their completion can be measured and monitored.

By creating measurable, mutually exclusive elements that all account for 100% of the project, construction professionals ensure that their programmes completely reflect the entire project.

Step 2: Determine Task Dependencies, Sequences & Durations

Here, the focus shifts to analysing how different tasks interconnect and influence each other within the project timeline. By identifying dependencies, Project Managers establish the correct sequence of activities. This careful coordination prevents bottlenecks and enhances overall project efficiency.

The Critical Path

In construction planning, the critical path represents the longest series of sequential tasks, determining the minimum time needed for project completion. Any delay in critical path tasks affects the project's end date. For example, on an office building project, the critical path could include sequential tasks like "Excavate site," "Pour concrete for foundation," "Install structural steel frame," "Complete external walls", and "Install roofing." Determining the critical path requires these steps:

1. List Tasks

   Project Managers start by listing all tasks needed to complete the project, usually derived from the WBS.

2. Sequence Tasks

   Next, they determine the order in which these tasks must occur, including dependencies. Some tasks can't start until others finish, while others can happen simultaneously.

3. Estimate Task Durations

   For each task, Project Managers establish an estimated duration. These estimates typically draw on past experience, industry standards and input from specialists or subcontractors.

4. Draw a Network Diagram

   The team then plots tasks, dependencies and durations on a network diagram that visually represents the order of operations.

5. Identify the Critical Path

   The critical path follows the sequence of tasks that has the longest total duration. If any task on this path gets delayed, it will push out the project's completion.

Identifying the critical path affects the following:

• Scheduling

  Understanding the critical path allows Project Managers to schedule activities for the most efficient use of time and resources. It shows them where flexibility exists in the programme (tasks not on the critical path may be delayed or rescheduled without affecting the overall project timeline) and where it doesn't (delays to critical path tasks directly impact the project end date).

• Contract

  Construction contracts often include clauses related to the project timeline, with Liquidated and Ascertained Damages (LADs) for late completion and sometimes bonuses for early completion. Identifying the critical path is crucial for making realistic contract commitments and understanding implications if delays occur.

• Finances

  The critical path affects cash flow, as money flows through monthly applications for payments based on progress. Critical path delays can lead to payment delays, affecting the project's financial health. Furthermore, delays can increase costs through longer plant hire periods, extra labour costs and liability for damages.

In other words, the critical path is more than just a planning tool – it's a major factor in the financial health of Main Contractors and subcontractors.

Step 3: Allocate Resources

Resource allocation involves assigning and managing the necessary resources (labour, materials, equipment, etc.) for each task. Project Managers effectively assign available resources to complete project tasks. In construction, resources primarily include labour, equipment and materials.

For example, the task "Install M&E services" might involve allocating a subcontractor's gang and ordering specific equipment. The general process follows these steps:

1. Identify Necessary Resources

   For each task in the WBS, Project Managers identify the necessary resources. This could involve specific trades, specialised equipment or certain materials.

2. Determine Availability & Constraints

   Next, the team determines the availability of these resources and any constraints (like budgetary limits or time restrictions).

3. Assign Resources

   Based on the requirements and constraints, Project Managers then assign resources to tasks in the project programme. This involves deciding how many resources each task needs and when the team will require them.

Resource allocation plays an important role in construction planning, since it influences many other aspects of the project:

• Overall Timeline

  Resource availability can directly affect the project programme. If a resource isn't available when required, a task may need to be delayed, which could impact the overall project timeline.

• Budget Management

  Effective resource allocation proves key to managing the project budget. Over-allocation of resources can lead to unnecessary costs, while under-allocation can cause delays, leading to potential cost overruns.

• Efficiency

  Proper resource allocation can also increase project efficiency. By ensuring that the team uses resources effectively and doesn't leave them sitting idle, Project Managers can save time and money and increase overall project productivity.

Careful resource allocation helps mitigate risks before a project starts on site. Of course, Project Managers must also carefully reallocate resources as the project unfolds and conditions change. Staying mindful of the critical path and budget helps Project Managers use resources wisely while maintaining profitability and an on-time finish.

Integrating Programme & Cost (5D BIM)

Moving beyond traditional planning, modern construction programmes increasingly link to cost data, a process often referred to as 5D BIM. By "cost-loading" the programme, commercial teams forecast monthly spend and cash flow requirements. This integration allows the Main Contractor to link progress (percentage complete) directly to valuations and applications for payment, ensuring positive cash flow throughout the build.

Step 4: Assess Risks

When creating and managing a construction programme, risk assessment provides a systematic approach to identify, evaluate and address potential hazards that could impact the project's timeline, cost or quality. It allows proactive planning and better decision-making, helping projects stay on track and within budget. Risk assessment generally involves the following steps:

1. Risk Identification

   The first step involves identifying potential risks. These could be anything from supplier issues, adverse weather or labour shortages, to regulatory changes that could potentially delay the project.

2. Risk Analysis

   Once the team identifies risks, they analyse their potential impact on the project. This could involve determining how the risk could affect the project programme, the costs involved and what mitigation would require.

3. Risk Response Planning

   Following risk analysis, Project Managers develop appropriate response strategies. This could involve contingency plans, allocating extra resources or adjusting the project programme to accommodate potential delays.

4. Risk Monitoring

   The last step involves continuous monitoring of identified risks and the effectiveness of response strategies. This ensures the project can adapt to changing circumstances and new risks that may arise.

With a proper risk assessment strategy built into the planning process, the Project Manager can provide a more realistic programme, insights into resource allocation and a higher quality deliverable.

Step 5: Continuously Monitor & Update

Continuous monitoring in construction enables managers to track progress, identify deviations and make necessary adjustments promptly. Crucially, it involves regular communication with all project stakeholders, ensuring everyone stays aligned with the evolving project programme. Continuous monitoring typically covers this process:

• Tracking Project Progress

  Project Managers track progress against the programme, assessing completed and remaining tasks.

• Comparing Actual vs. Planned Performance

  The team compares the project's actual progress against the planned programme. Any discrepancies can signal potential issues that require attention.

• Regular Meetings

  Scheduling regular meetings with key construction personnel forms a core part of the monitoring process. These meetings discuss progress, create and share look-ahead programmes, address issues and update the programme as necessary.

• Making Necessary Adjustments

  If the team identifies discrepancies or issues, they make necessary changes to the project programme. This could involve rescheduling tasks, reallocating resources or activating contingency plans.

• Updating Stakeholders

  Whenever changes occur to the project programme, Project Managers must communicate these updates to all relevant stakeholders, including the Client. This ensures everyone stays aware of the current project status and any changes in expectations.

Continually monitoring the project programme keeps a project on track – both for timeline and budget. The on-the-ground reality of a construction project always differs from the ideal plan laid out beforehand, but savvy construction Project Managers respond to changing circumstances to keep projects on track.

Visualising Construction Programmes

Visual representation of the construction programme enables all stakeholders to understand the plan clearly, facilitates coordination and aids in tracking project progress. While the construction process presents complexity, visual representation makes it more comprehensible and manageable. 

Three popular visualisation tools dominate the construction industry today: Gantt charts, network diagrams and 3D BIM models with programme data (also called BIM 4D). Each offers a unique perspective on the project timeline, tasks and dependencies, empowering project teams to manage the construction process more effectively.

The following sections explore each tool and its unique benefits to the construction planning process.

Gantt Charts

Gantt charts represent one of the most common construction programme visualisations used in the industry today. They provide a graphical representation of the construction programme, displaying all tasks and activities against a timeline. Each task appears as a horizontal bar, with bar length representing the planned task duration. Bar positioning on the timeline indicates the task's start and end dates. Arrows between bars represent dependencies among tasks.

Gantt charts function as dynamic planning tools that teams update and revise as construction progresses. As work completes or if delays occur, the team updates the Gantt chart to reflect these changes, allowing project stakeholders to see the current project status at a glance.

By showing dependencies between tasks, Gantt charts improve task and resource coordination in complex construction projects. This visualisation assists in sequencing activities, ensuring necessary prerequisite tasks complete before subsequent work begins. Gantt charts have several advantages:

• Visual Clarity

  They offer a clear, visual representation of the programme that all stakeholders easily understand.

• Task Dependencies

  Arrows show the interdependencies between various tasks, which can help to prevent programme conflicts.

• Progress Tracking

  Teams can update Gantt charts to reflect the actual progress of tasks, making it easier to compare planned progress with actual progress.

• Resource Planning

  They can provide a snapshot of when certain resources will be needed for specific tasks, helping in resource allocation and planning.

Using Gantt charts, construction Project Managers can visually manage, track and update their project programmes, leading to improved project execution and coordination.

Network Diagrams

Network diagrams, another key tool in construction planning, provide graphic representations of project tasks and their sequential relationships.

Unlike Gantt charts, which primarily emphasise the timeline, network diagrams emphasise the logical sequence of tasks and the dependencies between them. They present a clear sequence of events and outline how each task links to others, effectively showing the project flow. Nodes depict tasks and arrows show dependencies, illustrating the required task sequence.

As with Gantt charts, network diagrams are also dynamic. As the project progresses and circumstances change, the team updates the diagram to reflect these changes, giving a real-time representation of progress and any work sequence alterations.

Network diagrams play a crucial role in coordinating tasks. The dependency visualisation shows which tasks must complete before others can begin, improving workflow planning. Their advantages include:

• Task Sequencing

  They highlight the dependencies and sequence of tasks, providing a clear picture of the task flow.

• Critical Path Identification

  They can help to identify the critical path – the sequence of tasks that must complete on time for the project to finish on schedule.

• Sensitivity Analysis

  They can indicate which sequences of tasks have some scheduling flexibility (float) and which don't, providing an understanding of how sensitive the programme is to delays in specific tasks.

• Effective Coordination

  With a visual flow of tasks, network diagrams can assist in coordinating the sequence of work, helping to prevent programme conflicts and bottlenecks.

Teams can use network diagrams along with Gantt charts. Some Project Managers use a network diagram to lay out the logical sequence of dependencies for a project, then arrange them on a timeline with durations using a Gantt chart.

3D Models With Sequencing Data (4D BIM)

When using building information modelling (BIM), teams can link construction sequences and activities to the "base" 3D model of the project, providing a visual representation of the construction process over time. One of these levels focuses on the Programme – often referred to as 4D BIM. This allows project stakeholders to visualise the construction sequence, showing how the project will progress and how the site will appear at different stages.

Like Gantt charts and network diagrams, teams update 4D BIM models as construction progresses. As actual construction takes place, the team updates the 4D model to reflect the current project status. This allows stakeholders to view progress in a highly visual and intuitive format, enhancing understanding and communication.

Using 4D BIM can significantly improve coordination among project stakeholders. Visualising the construction process helps teams identify potential issues, such as clashes between different components or sequencing problems, before they occur on site. 4D BIM offers the following advantages:

• Visualising Construction Progress

  BIM 4D provides a dynamic view of the project's progress over time, allowing stakeholders to better visualise and understand the construction process.

• Improved Coordination

  Using a model paired with programme data can enhance coordination among stakeholders by highlighting potential conflicts or issues, aiding early resolution.

• Efficient Resource Management

  Modelling can assist in planning the use of resources, ensuring that the team has them available when needed and minimising idle time.

BIM 4D is a powerful tool for visualising the construction programme, promoting effective coordination and enhancing communication among project stakeholders. It represents the future of construction planning, combining the power of 3D modelling with the construction programme’s time-related data.

The Programme in UK Contracts (NEC & JCT)

Understanding the contractual framework is essential as construction programmes carry legal weight in the UK. The programme functions as more than just a management tool; it’s a central contractual document. The two most common contracts treat it differently:

1. NEC (New Engineering Contract)

   Clauses 31 and 32 place heavy emphasis on the programme. The Contractor must submit a programme for acceptance by the Project Manager. This "Accepted Programme" then becomes the tool for assessing all compensation events and delays.

2. JCT (Joint Contracts Tribunal)

   While traditionally less prescriptive, JCT contracts require submission of a "Master Programme." However, unlike NEC, it doesn't typically require the same rigorous cycle of monthly acceptance to remain valid.

Understanding whether a project operates under an NEC or JCT contract is vital for compliance and protecting the commercial position.

Common Planning Methodologies

The approach to planning can vary significantly depending on the planning method a Project Manager employs. Different methodologies offer unique perspectives, tools and strategies for planning, managing and controlling the project programme. Some may prioritise collaboration and flexibility, while others might emphasise strict task sequencing or repetitive work management:

These methodologies don't operate in isolation, and a construction project may utilise more than one method concurrently. For instance, a project might apply the Critical Path Method for overall programme development and the Last Planner System to enhance frontline worker engagement. 

Each methodology offers unique advantages and can contribute to the construction programme’s robustness and resilience. The choice depends on various factors, including the project's complexity, the team's expertise and the Client's preferences and requirements.

Critical Path Method (CPM)

The Critical Path Method (CPM) is a staple in construction planning, often adopted for its ability to effectively visualise and manage project timelines. CPM represents a type of "push planning," where Project Managers establish the works programme and "push" tasks forward based on the project's needs and deadlines.

In practice, CPM begins with identifying all individual tasks or activities required to complete the project. The team then sequences these tasks according to their dependencies, and Project Managers estimate the duration of each task. The result produces a network diagram clearly showing the "critical path" – the sequence of tasks determining the minimum project duration. Tasks on the critical path have zero "float", meaning any delay in these tasks will directly impact the project completion date. Identifying the critical path enables Project Managers to prioritise tasks and direct resources where they’re most needed. However, like any methodology, CPM has strengths and weaknesses:

Although teams use CPM widely, it’s rarely the only planning tool in a construction project's toolbox. Construction professionals commonly integrate it with other methodologies, each selected to complement the others and address the project’s unique complexities and requirements. This balanced, multi-method approach mitigates each method’s drawbacks and leverages its advantages, leading to more resilient and effective project planning.

Last Planner System (LPS)

The Last Planner System (LPS) operates as a collaborative, commitment-based planning system integrating pull planning with constraint analysis, lookahead scheduling and weekly work planning. Originating from the principles of Lean Construction, it puts the decision-making process in the hands of the people carrying out the tasks – the last planners.

In practice, LPS employs a series of collaborative meetings involving key project stakeholders, where the team backward schedules tasks from a milestone or project completion date. This "pull" approach ensures teams plan work based on the readiness and capacity of the workforce – not pushed onto them without considering existing conditions.

Here we outline the Last Planner System’s advantages and drawbacks, with strategies to handle these challenges:

The Last Planner System works best when team members willingly commit to their responsibilities and proactively discuss constraints and changes. This is particularly true in complex projects with multiple interdependent tasks and overlapping packages, such as commercial construction projects or large infrastructure projects, where coordinating schedules between multiple stakeholders is necessary.

Program Evaluation & Review Technique (PERT)

The Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) is a statistical tool designed to analyse the duration of tasks involved in completing a project. It proves particularly useful in projects where task duration carries uncertainty. In construction, PERT provides a valuable tool to manage the inherent uncertainty of construction processes.

PERT begins with three estimates for each construction task:

1. Optimistic Time (O)

   The minimum possible time required to accomplish a task, assuming everything proceeds better than is normally expected.

2. Pessimistic Time (P)

   The maximum possible time required to accomplish a task, assuming everything goes wrong (but excluding major catastrophes).

3. Most Likely Time (M)

   The best estimate of the time required to accomplish a task, assuming everything proceeds as normal.

Using those estimates, a Project Manager can use a formula – (O + 4M +P) / 6 – to determine the expected time and variance for each task, helping them create a more realistic programme and account for potential shifts in task durations.

PERT helps with risk mitigation in construction planning by assigning a time range to each activity rather than a fixed duration, allowing for a more realistic programme. Furthermore, the variance calculation gives Project Managers insight into which activities carry the most risk associated with their completion times, enabling targeted risk management efforts. This approach has pros and cons:

Teams often combine PERT with other planning methods to maximise its benefits while mitigating limitations. For instance, combining PERT with the Critical Path Method (CPM) allows more rigorous analysis of the project programme, blending PERT's probabilistic approach with CPM's deterministic model.

Moreover, PERT's focus on risk assessment aligns well with the proactive approach of methodologies like Lean Construction or the Last Planner System. These methodologies promote a collaborative planning process and emphasise continuous learning.

Line of Balance (LOB)

For projects involving repetitive tasks spanning multiple units or locations, such as the construction of identical units in a high-rise building or a housing development, a unique methodology called Line of Balance (LOB) can be effective.

Line of Balance, also known as flowline or repetitive programming method, is a graphical tool used to optimise the scheduling and management of repetitive tasks. It displays the rate at which these tasks need to occur to maintain a continuous workflow, thereby balancing resources and ensuring steady progress.

LOB programmes present a visual depiction of scheduled work and actual work completed. The programme appears on a chart with two axes:

1. The vertical axis typically represents the sequence of tasks or activities. The team lists these tasks in completion order.
2. The horizontal axis represents the time, often with a specific scale like days, weeks or months.

The basic LOB chart contains diagonal lines for each task. Each line starts at the point representing when a task should start for the first unit (or location), and ends at the point representing when the task should finish for the last unit. The line's slope signifies the work speed. A steeper line indicates a faster pace, while a less steep line indicates slower work.

LOB aims to create a steady and continuous workflow, with no idle time between tasks. This appears on the chart as a series of parallel lines, with no gaps between the end of one task and the start of the next.

When construction teams plot actual work progress on the chart, they can easily spot deviations from the planned programme. If actual work lags behind the planned programme, the line representing actual work would fall below the planned line. Conversely, if work runs ahead of schedule, the actual work line would appear above the planned line. This method carries several advantages and drawbacks:

Line of Balance is particularly beneficial when used with other planning methods. For instance, teams can use the Critical Path Method to schedule the project’s non-repetitive tasks, while LOB handles repetitive tasks. This combination ensures the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the project programme. As with any methodology, understanding when and where LOB applies most effectively is important, and teams should adjust their approach based on specific project needs.

Planning Challenges

Every construction project, no matter how well-planned, can encounter programme challenges. These may arise due to unforeseen site conditions, changes in project scope, adverse weather, resource availability issues and more. Understanding these challenges and being aware of them helps Project Managers better prepare for and mitigate potential project delays and overruns:

Teams proactively manage many challenges by incorporating contingencies during programme creation. However, problems inevitably arise on site. The following strategies help Project Managers respond effectively.

Strategies to Mitigate Programme Delays

Construction Project Managers have an arsenal of strategies to overcome potential programme obstacles, ranging from proactive to reactive. Project Managers select approaches based on the situation, available resources and potential impacts on timeline and budget. Common strategies include:

Look-ahead Programmes

Look-ahead programmes are proactive planning tools offering a detailed view of what teams expect to happen during a construction project’s immediate future. They typically cover the short-term, spanning two to six weeks, and teams update them regularly – usually weekly. The look-ahead programme’s focus centres on managing upcoming tasks that are prepared, fully resourced and ready to proceed. Key steps include:

1. Identify Upcoming Tasks

   These are the tasks that are scheduled to occur within the next few weeks. The time frame can vary, but it's generally short-term.

2. Break Down the Tasks

   The team breaks each task into sub-tasks or activities, providing granular detail.

3. Assign Resources

   Project Managers determine which resources (materials, labour, equipment) each task needs and ensure they will be available when required. This step also involves assigning responsibility for each task to a specific team or individual.

4. Update Regularly

   The team updates the look-ahead programme at regular intervals, such as every week. This allows for any necessary adjustments based on the actual project progress.

Collaboration is key to the success of look-ahead programmes. Project team members must coordinate and communicate regularly to ensure everyone stays aligned about preparation for upcoming tasks. This may involve regular meetings or check-ins to discuss the look-ahead programme and any potential issues.

Look-ahead programmes mitigate delays by providing short-term visibility into upcoming work. Teams can anticipate issues early and ensure tasks are execution-ready with the necessary resources in place.

Resource Levelling

Resource levelling resolves allocation problems by adjusting the programme to balance demand with available supply.

The process:

1. Identify Resource Constraints

   The first step in resource levelling involves identifying resource constraints. Resources most often include people, equipment or materials.

2. Review the Project Programme

   With constraints in mind, Project Managers review the project programme. They examine the task sequence and the resources allocated to each task. They note any instances where a resource faces overallocation – for example, a tradesperson scheduled to work more hours in a time period than proves feasible.

3. Adjust the Programme

   Next, Project Managers adjust the programme to address overallocation. This can involve delaying tasks or splitting them over longer durations. The objective ensures no resource faces overuse at any point in the programme.

4. Review & Repeat

   Finally, Project Managers review the modified programme and repeat the process as necessary until they achieve balanced resource distribution throughout the project timeline. This might also involve reassessing task dependencies and constraints to find more efficient planning options.

For example, on a project, Project Managers might find their team of electricians is scheduled to work on wiring in multiple parts of a building simultaneously. In this case, they would reschedule these tasks so they occur consecutively rather than concurrently, preventing overallocation.

Resource levelling offers several significant benefits. Avoiding overallocation helps to prevent team burnout, ensuring productivity and morale remain high. It can also result in cost savings without requiring overtime or additional staff.

However, resource levelling has some drawbacks. While ensuring teams use resources efficiently, a trade-off may occur in project duration. Resource levelling can extend the project timeline as Project Managers reschedule tasks to avoid resource overallocation. This means projects might take longer to complete than initially planned.

Furthermore, while resource levelling might prevent resource over-exertion, it could also inadvertently create periods of resource inactivity. Waiting times or idle times might occur when teams don't fully use resources, which can lead to inefficiencies.

Despite these challenges, resource levelling offers a proactive approach to ensuring teams use resources efficiently and effectively throughout the project's lifespan. This prevents burnout and can lead to significant cost savings.

Programme Compression

Programme compression is a construction project management strategy that shortens the project programme without changing works scope. Project teams typically employ this due to project delays – or when the project must complete earlier than planned. In construction, this technique is paramount, especially in large-scale projects where meeting deadlines often ties to significant financial implications like Liquidated and Ascertained Damages (LADs).

Two primary techniques generally apply for programme compression: crashing and fast-tracking.

1. Crashing

   This involves adding more resources to critical path tasks to complete them faster. For example, if a construction project falls behind, crashing could involve procuring additional labour or extending site hours to speed up the process and complete tasks in a shorter period.

2. Fast-tracking

   This operates as a technique where activities initially planned to occur sequentially now execute in parallel or overlap. To actually shorten the programme, this means the tasks performed in parallel must sit on the critical path.

Here is how programme compression is generally applied:

1. Identify the Critical Path

   First, teams need to understand which tasks directly impact the project's completion date. These are the tasks on the critical path. Delays in these tasks will cause the entire project to be delayed.

2. Explore Alternatives

   Teams look for tasks within the critical path that can be sped up without affecting works scope. This could involve adding extra shifts, increasing labour or employing more efficient equipment.

3. Decide on a Strategy

   Based on the analysis, Project Managers decide whether crashing, fast-tracking, or a combination of both suits the situation.

4. Implement the Changes

   Project teams implement the decided programme compression techniques. This could involve hiring additional workers, working overtime or executing tasks in parallel that were originally planned sequentially.

5. Monitor the Results

   After implementing compression techniques, Project Managers monitor results closely and manage emerging risks, such as increased costs (from crashing) or rework (from fast-tracking).

Project teams should remember that programme compression is a reactive strategy that can help bring a delayed construction project back on track. However, it carries risks, so Project Managers must carefully consider the potential implications before making changes to the project programme.

Crashing, for instance, can increase overall project cost. The additional resources, whether for labour or equipment, will inflate the budget. This strategy may also cause resource fatigue or resource over-allocation, leading to decreased productivity. The quality of work may suffer due to the rush to complete tasks, which can lead to costly and time-consuming rework.

Fast-tracking increases risks when overlapping sequential tasks, potentially causing rework. For example, starting interior work before structural approval means design changes may require rework. This can increase miscommunication and coordination problems among teams.

Proper planning and clear communication can mitigate these risks. When deadlines are critical, the benefits typically outweigh the drawbacks, making compression a valuable adaptation tool.

Forensic Programme Analysis

Forensic programme analysis examines the construction programme after project completion to identify when and why deviations from the plan occurred. It determines delay causes, project impacts and responsibility, helping Main Contractors and Clients avoid similar issues in future projects.

The analyst follows these steps:

1. Review the Original Programme

   They begin by reviewing the original planned programme, including planned start and end dates for each activity, the sequencing of activities and the identified dependencies between them.

2. Review the Actual Progress

   The analyst then compares the planned programme to what actually happened. This involves reviewing progress reports, meeting minutes, daily logs, variations and any other documentation providing information about when activities started and finished and when teams allocated resources.

3. Identify Delays

   They identify any activities that experienced delays or disruption, noting when these delays occurred and how long they lasted.

4. Analyse Causes of Delays

   They try to determine the causes of identified delays. This could include factors like scope changes, adverse weather, errors in the original programme, resource shortages or other unforeseen issues.

5. Determine the Impact Analysis

   Finally, the analyst determines the impact of identified delays on the overall project. This involves calculating how much the project was delayed overall and identifying any knock-on effects on subsequent activities.

Project teams can use the results of forensic programme analysis to resolve disputes about delays, determine liability for increased costs or provide lessons for future projects.

The Future of Construction Planning

Advanced analytics, machine learning and AI can revolutionise construction planning, improving prediction accuracy and enabling timely adjustments.

AI analyses past projects to forecast realistic timelines and resource requirements while providing real-time programme adjustments, strengthening proactive planning and risk mitigation. BIM and 3D visualisation tools increasingly integrate with programming software, creating detailed 4D programmes that enhance planning, communication and risk mitigation.

Regardless of what future technologies promise, construction planning mitigates complex project risks, ensuring teams deliver on time, on budget and safely. As tools and methodologies evolve, the goal of making the construction process more predictable and manageable becomes increasingly attainable. For construction planning, the ideal is a landscape where projects run more smoothly, teams anticipate unexpected events, and the process becomes more streamlined and efficient.

Written by

Daniel Gray

Contributing Writer

33 articles

Daniel is an educator and writer with a speciality in construction. He has been writing construction content for Procore since 2022, and previously served as a Procore Content Manager before continuing to pursue an education career as an Assistant Headmaster for Valor Education in Austin. Daniel's experience writing for construction — as well as several clients under an agency — has broadened his knowledge and expertise across multiple subjects.

View profile

Julia Tell

Contributing Writer | Procore Technologies

71 articles

Julia Tell is a freelance writer covering education, construction, healthcare, and digital transformation. She holds a Ph.D. in Media & Communications and has written for publications including Business Insider, GoodRx, and EdSurge, as well as nonprofits, international businesses, and educational institutions.

View profile

Reviewed by

Justin Vogel

Senior Solutions Engineer, Owners | Procore

Justin is a Senior Strategic Product Consultant for Procore. Justin has an extensive background in real estate development, construction engineering, and project management professional entrusted with high profile structures, and is involved in over $3.5 billion worth of construction representing developers, CEO's, GC's, equity partners, consultants, and attorneys in unique and complex pursuits.

View profile

Alex Six

Solution Specialist, C&I Industry Specialist | Procore Technologies

16 articles

Alex Six is an Enterprise & Strategic Civil & Infrastructure Overlay Account Executive for Procore. Alex has a long background in the construction industry beginning with an internship with one of the biggest contractors in the world, and expanding across projects with teams as small as 4 people and as large as multi-billion dollar budgets with large teams and disciplines. His resume includes Caltrans highways & bridges, Metro light rail & underground, as well as airport runways and utilities.

View profile

Zoe Mullan

27 articles

Zoe Mullan is an experienced content writer and editor with a background in marketing and communications in the e-learning sector. Zoe holds an MA in English Literature and History from the University of Glasgow and a PGDip in Journalism from the University of Strathclyde and lives in Northern Ireland.

View profile

Nicholas Dunbar

Content Manager | Procore

65 articles

Nick Dunbar oversees the creation and management of UK and Ireland educational content at Procore. Previously, he worked as a sustainability writer at the Building Research Establishment and served as a sustainability consultant within the built environment sector. Nick holds degrees in industrial sustainability and environmental sciences and lives in Camden, London.

View profile