Control the Chaos: Standardising Document Workflows in Construction Projects

Document control and implementation play a central role in managing risk, meeting deadlines, and delivering projects to spec. As builds become more complex and teams increasingly disperse, the volume and velocity of information can strain traditional systems. In this context, refining construction document workflows cuts delays and protects margins.

This article outlines the key elements of effective document control, the challenges commercial builders face, and how mature systems support better collaboration, accountability, and decision-making across every stage of project delivery. Ultimately, robust construction project document workflows ensure that all stakeholders are on the same page.

What is Document Control in Construction?

Construction document control structures the management of all project-related documentation. Essentially, it involves creating, distributing, tracking, and archiving materials across the project life cycle, including:

• Drawings
• RFIs
• Submittals
• Specifications
• BIM models
• Inspection records
• Contracts 

A disciplined document control process ensures teams work from accurate, current information. In turn, this clarity supports faster decision-making, reduces rework risk, and keeps projects aligned with regulatory requirements under Building Regulations, Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015) and BS ISO 19650.

Moreover, a centralised, accessible record of approvals and changes helps reinforce compliance, build stakeholder confidence, and promote accountability throughout the project life cycle. In practical terms, a clean, time-stamped audit trail serves as the first line of defence in adjudication or dispute resolution.

Core Elements of Document Control

• Creation, Review, & Approval

  Templates standardise formatting across teams, while rules around document precedence resolve conflicts that arise on site. For example, while JCT and NEC contracts often treat documents as 'mutually explanatory,' defining a clear 'Order of Precedence' in the prelims (e.g., stating the Specification supersedes Drawings in case of ambiguity) prevents costly disputes.
  
  To implement this effectively, organisations should spell out repeatable procedures for drawings, RFIs, site diaries and inspections, and publish editable templates from day one. Additionally, running toolbox talks and screen-share demos ensures every trade masters the digital workflow.

• Version Control

  For documents such as RFIs, site diaries and drawings, dedicated software automatically tracks versions. Automatic versioning locks historic files and stamps the latest revision, thereby slashing rework and providing a reliable audit trail.

• Storage & Retrieval

  Systems typically follow a standardised template, with folders arranged by project phase and document type. Consistent naming conventions – document type, discipline, version and status – improve searchability and avoid duplication. Meanwhile, the system locks older versions to prevent accidental use, while a metadata trail records every change.
  
  When teams clearly define and centralise these systems, locating or storing documents becomes quick and reliable. As a result, this minimises search time for files and supports better coordination between disciplines. Consequently, storing every file in one Common Data Environment (CDE) ensures the team always works from a single source of truth, hosted in the UK to keep data within GDPR and sovereign-cloud boundaries.

• Distribution & Communication

  Predefined roles and responsibilities govern access to project documentation. Role-based access – designers edit, subcontractors view – keeps accountability crystal clear. Permissions control who can view, edit, or share specific files, thereby helping prevent errors and miscommunication.
  
  Integrated tools that replace email threads and scattered updates centralise communication, creating a clear record of document activity. With greater visibility, project leaders can ensure critical information reaches the right people without delay.

• Archiving

  All documentation is archived in a secure, searchable format, forming a complete record of project activity. These archives support compliance with UK regulations and protect in the event of audits, claims, or contractual disputes. Specifically, time-stamped transmittals prove exactly who saw what and when – critical for insurers and regulators.
  
  Beyond compliance, regular reviews ensure archiving procedures align with current legal requirements, including the Building Safety Act 2022. Additionally, a reliable archiving system supports future work by providing reference points for similar projects or ongoing asset management.

Common Document Management Challenges

Document control in construction faces pressure from multiple angles – tight timelines, dispersed teams, shifting scopes, and a constant stream of information. The Get It Right Initiative estimates construction errors cost UK builders £21 billion annually. Without the right systems and structure, these conditions create friction that affects quality, compliance, and profitability.

Version Confusion & Outdated Information

Inconsistent version control can leave teams working with outdated documents. When project teams share multiple revisions informally (email, messaging apps, or printed copies), tracking which version is current becomes difficult.

This confusion leads to costly rework, programme delays, compliance failures, and contractual disputes. Moreover, the risk amplifies on larger projects where many stakeholders reference the same material across different locations.

Limited Accessibility & Poor Distribution

Documents stored in disconnected systems or spread across paper and digital formats create access challenges. In particular, site teams often struggle to retrieve the latest files, especially in remote or fast-moving environments.

Without centralisation, teams resort to ad-hoc methods:

• Forwarding files by email
• Sharing screenshots via messaging apps
• Printing and circulating physical copies

However, these workarounds lack visibility and control, making it harder to verify who has received and reviewed the correct information.

Time-Consuming Administration

Manual document management creates significant overhead. Reviewing, updating, and chasing approvals consume time that could be spent on site.

To add to this, teams often miss follow-ups when they handle approvals through informal channels. On commercial builds with tight timelines, this added friction can create cascading delays across trades and subcontractors.

Increased Risk of Error

Without structured systems, teams struggle to detect incomplete or conflicting documents. They may unknowingly act on inaccurate information, especially when quality checks rely on manual oversight.

Likewise, inconsistent document practices (variable naming, untracked edits, unclear ownership) make maintaining accuracy difficult. In turn, these gaps raise the risk of non-compliance, missed inspections, or costly site issues that impact safety and programme performance.

Lack of Standardisation

Teams that follow individual approaches to naming, filing, or reviewing documents create inevitable confusion. The absence of a shared structure increases the likelihood of duplicated work, miscommunication, or delays during coordination.

What's more, this inconsistency also affects project close-out. Without standardised records, handovers and audits become more time-intensive, ultimately exposing the business to added operational and legal risk.

Learn about the future of the built environment - Read Procore's Future State of Construction report

Learn how contractors, subcontractors, and project teams can take advantage of new opportunities to boost efficiency and profitability over the next decade. Download the report to get your roadmap to the future state of construction.

Download now

How to Optimise Document Control

1. Establish Project-Wide Standards

   Setting expectations early reduces confusion later. During mobilisation, project teams should define document control protocols in the execution plan. Crucially, the full delivery team needs formalised responsibilities for drafting, reviewing, approving, and distributing documents.
   
   Key practices include:
   - Stating the contract's order of precedence (specification before drawings in JCT/NEC forms)
   - Developing a project-specific control plan that outlines workflows, terminology, and metadata requirements
   - Briefing all consultants and subcontractors on documentation expectations before engagement
   - Running toolbox talks and screen-share demos to build digital confidence
   
   Once implemented, with standards set upfront, teams spend less time chasing clarifications and more time progressing the build.

2. Implement Structured Organisation

   Disorganised storage slows down delivery and increases the risk of error. A structured folder hierarchy, mapped to project phases and deliverables, creates consistency across teams and improves file retrieval at every stage.
   
   This structure should:
   - Categorise documents by function – design, approvals, safety, variations
   - Include pre-built folder trees in templates, deployed across all new projects
   - Apply consistent naming logic from project code through to revision number
   - Undergo regular audits to identify misplacements or inconsistencies
   
   In addition, for large-scale programmes, a shared structure also supports faster onboarding of new team members and consultants.

3. Standardise Naming & Versioning

   File naming and version tracking commonly disrupt projects. When teams reference the wrong drawings or submit outdated specifications, the downstream effects may be significant.
   
   To prevent this:
   - Include document type, discipline, version, and status in file names
   - Apply ISO 19650 status codes consistently (e.g., S3 for Review, A1 for Construction, S4 for Stage Approval) to eliminate ambiguity.
   - Lock older versions to prevent accidental use
   - Maintain a version log or metadata trail for audit purposes
   - Use document control platforms to automate tracking
   
   Standardisation not only ensures clarity; it also provides legal defensibility if disputes arise over changes or approvals. Noteably, standard names matter most for RFIs, site diaries and the Health & Safety File required at handover.

4. Control Access Precisely

   Access control protects data integrity and maintains accountability. Rather than convenience, permissions should reflect project roles.
   
   Assign access based on:
   - Package ownership
   - Document sensitivity
   - Approval responsibilities
   
   Equally important, track views and downloads for critical records such as certifications and instructions. Similarly, restrict contracts and insurances to 'Commercial-Confidential' tags with view-only rights for site teams. At the same time, maintain segmented access between internal teams and external collaborators, while keeping all communication, including comments, mark-ups, and transmittals, within the same controlled system.

5. Enable Real-Time Digital Access

   Project teams need access to accurate documentation wherever they work – from head office to job site to a client meeting on the road. To achieve this, cloud-based systems offer the flexibility required to operate at speed.
   
   Key features to prioritise include:
   - Real-time syncing across desktop and mobile devices
   - Offline access for remote or low-connectivity environments
   - Centralised updates to eliminate reliance on outdated PDFs or printed copies
   
   Put simply, field teams should never have to guess if a drawing is current. Cloud access ensures they don't.

6. Automate Workflows & Escalation

   Removing manual friction where possible improves efficiency. Automated workflows ensure document reviews, sign-offs, and escalations happen on time and with clear accountability.
   
   This can include:
   - Rule-based approvals for ITPs, RFIs, design changes, and NCRs
   - Automatic routing of RFIs and design changes with escalation pings after 24 hours
   - Automated alerts for overdue reviews or pending sign-offs
   - Task assignments triggered by workflow stage or document type
   - Dashboards that surface current document statuses and review queues
   
   For example, running monthly Power BI dashboards spots approvals that are stalling before they dent the programme. Meanwhile, AI can flag drawings with missing approvals before they hit site. Importantly, beyond saving time, automation reveals what delays progress and who needs to act.

7. Build Feedback Loops & Audit Mechanisms

   A document control process should evolve throughout the project. High-performing teams treat it as a live system that improves with input and real-world pressure testing.
   
   To make that happen:
   - Schedule reviews at defined project stages (e.g. design freeze, handover)
   - Capture feedback from key functions, not just document controllers
   - Simulate traceability tests to check how easily teams can follow a document trail
   - Track lessons learned across projects and update processes accordingly
   - Capture every revision in the Golden Thread to comply with the Building Safety Act 2022
   
   Ultimately, the goal is not just control. It is resilience, reliability, and continual improvement.

Compliance & Accountability

A clear audit trail underpins trust with regulators, insurers and clients. Together, time-stamped transmittals, locked revisions and role-based access demonstrate that the project team followed due process at every stage.

Integrating Workflows into the UK Project Life Cycle

Each workflow supports the RIBA Plan of Work's seven stages:

1. Strategic Definition
2. Preparation and Brief
3. Concept Design
4. Spatial Coordination
5. Technical Design
6. Manufacturing and Construction
7. Handover and In-Use

Mapping CDE folders and approval gates to these stages keeps the Golden Thread intact and accelerates close-out.

Key Takeaways

• One UK-hosted CDE creates a single source of truth
• Role-based permissions protect data integrity
• Standard names and locked versions curb costly rework
• Golden Thread records satisfy the Building Safety Act 2022
• Automation and analytics surface blockers before they hurt the programme

FAQs

Q: What is a construction CDE?

A: A Common Data Environment is a cloud platform that stores, manages, and shares project information in real time.

Q: How does the Building Safety Act 2022 affect document control?

A: It mandates a secure Golden Thread of information for higher-risk buildings, making robust version control and audit trails essential.

Q: Which UK standards apply to digital information management?

A: BS ISO 19650 sets out principles for managing information over the asset life cycle.

Written by

Reviewed by