Understanding the Difference Between JSA and SWMS

Across Australian job sites, two documents define how teams assess and control risk: the Job Safety Analysis (JSA) and the Safe Work Method Statement (SWMS). Both are fixtures in safety management—but they’re not interchangeable, and treating them as such can expose projects to compliance gaps, enforcement action, or missed hazards on high-risk work.

Understanding the difference between a JSA and a SWMS isn’t just procedural. It’s operational. A SWMS is a legal requirement for high-risk construction work. A JSA isn’t. But it can surface risks the SWMS misses if conditions shift or unplanned tasks emerge on site.

This article explains the difference between a JSA and SWMS, clarifies when each is required under WHS law, and offers practical guidance for using both tools to drive safety outcomes on fast-moving commercial builds.

What is Job Safety Analysis (JSA)?

A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) is a task-level risk assessment that helps teams identify and control hazards before work begins. It breaks each job into individual steps to pinpoint where things could go wrong and how to prevent incidents. 

Here’s how it works:

• JSAs zoom in on the task, the tools used, the people involved, and the work environment. 
• They employ control measures that include engineering solutions, administrative processes, and personal protective equipment. 
• They’re not a legal requirement under Australian WHS lawbut are still recognised (and adhered to) as best practice. 
• It’s vital when workers and supervisors face non-routine or unfamiliar work or situations (in other words, when a Standard Operating Procedure or Work Instruction does not exist).
• JSA use improves hazard awareness, supports team coordination, and helps prevent injuries by addressing risks before work begins.

What is a Safe Work Method Statement (SWMS)?

A Safe Work Method Statement (SWMS) is a legally mandated safety document outlining the high-risk tasks, the hazards involved, and the control measures needed to eliminate or minimise each risk.

Additional key points about the SWMS set it apart from the JSA:

• An SWMS assigns responsibility for implementing and monitoring each control measure. 
• Unlike the JSA, which is best practice rather than legal stipulation, SWMS are required for all high-risk construction work under Safe Work Australia’s model WHS Regulations.
• Like the JSA, it must be completed before work begins and updated when project, task, or on-site work changes occur.

Beyond compliance, an SWMS plays a critical role in improving safety outcomes. It ensures high-risk activities are carefully planned, hazards are clearly understood, and effective controls are in place before work starts.

Key Differences Between JSA and SWMS

It’s important to note that completing a JSA does not eliminate the need for a SWMS if the law requires one for that task.

However, a JSA can be used as a foundation for developing a SWMS, as the hazard identification and control measures can be transferred if the task evolves into or becomes part of a high-risk construction activity.

What Should a JSA Contain?

A Job Safety Analysis (JSA) sets out the steps of a task, the hazards associated with each step, and the control measures needed to reduce risk. A well-prepared JSA should include:

• A clear description of the job or task
• A step-by-step breakdown of how the task is performed
• Hazard identification for each step, covering:
• Control measures for each hazard, with a focus on eliminating or reducing risk

To ensure the JSA is accurate and practical, both supervisors and workers need to provide their input and contribute to its development. The process should also consider the specific tools, environment, and task conditions.

What Should a SWMS Contain?

A Safe Work Method Statement (SWMS) must clearly outline how risks associated with high-risk construction work will be managed on site. It should provide enough detail to guide safe execution and demonstrate compliance with WHS obligations.

A compliant SWMS includes:

• A clear description of the high-risk construction work being performed
• A list of hazards and associated risks for each high-risk task
• Control measures for each hazard, based on the hierarchy of controls
• Details on how each control measure will be implemented, including when and where it applies and what methods or standards will be used
• Responsibilities for each control, specifying who is accountable for implementation and monitoring
• Procedures for monitoring, reviewing, and updating the SWMS as site conditions or work methods change
• Site-specific language, supported by diagrams or other documentation where appropriate

Understanding the difference between JSA and SWMS helps ensure the right safety process is used for the task.

JSAs and SWMSs both support safer construction work, but they apply in different situations. Knowing the difference between them helps teams stay compliant and reduce risk on-site.

Written by